The real solution to the scorched earth problem is for aging from
blacklists to be dynamic.
if we were designing a full internet system with reputation as a feature,
then no doubt it would be like you're describing. however, reputation
systems are a private action by private right of action and each one will
have its own cost:benefit considerations. this means while it might be a
good design overall, blacklist aging has to be in the interests of
particular blacklist operators and subscribers, or it won't happen. it
generally does not happen, since it costs more value than it produces from
the point of view of a given blacklist operator or subscriber.
i think there's an argument to be made that this is inevitable. every time
any ISP has enforced any kind of numerical limits on abuse by one of its
customers (like first hit's free, three strikes and you're out, and so on)
the abusers have either rotated through providers or through identities
fast enough to make their business run in spite of the limits, or they have
merely counted these slaps on the wrist as part of the cost of doing
business. this means if blacklist entries all aged out, then abusers and
their ISPs would simply rotate through a long chain of address blocks, and
we'd see a lot of address space consumed on the "waiting for reprieve" list
but it would not change the overall abuse growth rate at all.
that's not in the interests of individual blacklist operators or subscribers,
who want to control abuse growth rate.
includes things like prevalence, persistence, and "badness", with a
Gaussian decay function as to time, to establish cut levels for what
should be blocked.=20
Look at Phil Porras work, and Usenix presentations.
can you tell me, before i invest my own time in it, whether this work
accounts for the inevitable rebalancing and planning adjustments that the
abusers will make if each proposed policy were rolled out? i fear that
most studies in this area treat abuse like it was a natural phenomena and
not the self-organized well-motivated thievery that it is. abusers aren't
going to sit still while we wrap them in a gaussian decay function.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.