can all current nanog threads move to nanog-ot@ plz?

[Paul Vixie]

here's how it looks just before i hit the "catch up" button.

[ 23: mailman-***@nanog.] nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder
[ 90: "James Hess" ] Re: DNS and potential energy
< 155: Marshall Eubanks >
[ 22: John Levine ]
< 35: "Jay R. Ashworth" >
< 119: Rob Pickering >
< 21: Tony Finch >
Y -[ 82: Jeroen Massar ] REJECT-ON-SMTP-DATA (Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's
[ 15: Roland Perry ] Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens
[ 10: Roland Perry ] Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up
[ 12: Stephane Bortzmeyer ] Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
< 23: Tony Finch >
< 50: Phil Regnauld >
[ 36: David Conrad ] TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy)
Y - [ 30: ***@bt.co]
[ 31: "Jay R. Ashworth" ] Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's
[ 19: Joe Greco ]
[ 135: "Jay R. Ashworth" ] RFC 1480 - does it generalize (was What Problem; was ICANN/Pandora)
[ 60: Chris Owen ] Re: REJECT-ON-SMTP-DATA (Re: Mail Server best practices - was:
[ 26: "Jay R. Ashworth" ] Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs

[Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.]

Post by Paul Vixie
here's how it looks just before i hit the "catch up" button.

Damn! All that operational stuff on NANOG. Whodathunkit?!